The rejected plan sought to limit subrogation payments, a move that critics warned would have hiked annual insurance premiums by hundreds of dollars for average households and thousands for those in high-risk zones. Legislators also dismantled provisions that would have restricted the recovery of economic and non-economic damages, specifically protecting those claiming losses from smoke damage outside of narrow, government-defined fire perimeters.
California Legislature Rejects Newsom’s Utility Bailout Plan
California lawmakers have defied Governor Gavin Newsom’s attempt to overhaul wildfire liability, siding with survivors over utility companies in a rare end-of-session defeat for the administration. The legislature blocked proposals that would have capped damages for victims and shifted the financial burden of utility-sparked fires onto insurance policyholders.
Joy Chen, executive director of the Every Fire Survivor's Network, characterized the decision as a critical safeguard for those who have lost homes and property. Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog, credited the Senate and Assembly for maintaining these protections despite heavy political pressure from the Governor’s office and utility interests. By refusing to adopt the bailout terms, the legislature effectively preserved the existing legal pathways for victims to hold utilities accountable for infrastructure-related disasters.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!